Week 12

Evolving Debris Generation:

From Static Emitters to Reactive Debris


Debris Generation and Control

After an initial attempt the previous week using a more traditional debris emitter system, the approach to debris simulation evolved significantly this week.
Originally, debris was generated by emitting points across the impact zone using the custom-shaped velocity field, with random instancing of pre-modeled debris pieces from a custom library. While functional, this method felt too disconnected from the actual destruction behavior and lacked the natural timing and physicality needed to truly sell the event.

Recognizing these limitations, I pivoted this week to a reactive debris spawning system directly tied to the fractured geometry’s motion.

The updated workflow involved:

  1. Particles Shooting from Fractured Pieces

    • Instead of scattering debris from static emitters, particles were now spawned dynamically from fractured pieces during motion.

    • This ensured that debris was generated precisely when and where the primary fracture pieces moved or peeled away, enhancing realism.

Jittering Trail Parts for Organic Motion

  • To avoid mechanical-looking debris trails, a jitter system randomized the particle traveling trajectory to not give a uniform appearance.

  • This gave the debris a chaotic, natural spread, matching the energy of the cracking and peeling motion.

Instanced Debris Geometry

  • Finally, the particle trails were populated with instanced debris from the original debris library, maintaining efficient performance while preserving visual complexity.

  • The new system still benefited from the earlier work modeling debris assets but applied them in a much more dynamic and believable way.

By shifting from a static emitter-based method to a motion-driven debris system, the destruction sequence now features reactive, physically motivated secondary motion, adding a significant layer of polish and realism.

Future refinements could include debris amount and lifetime optimization, mass-dependent debris behavior, and potentially layering in more size variation for the instanced pre-modeled debris pieces using pscale for even more closer match to the reference shot.

Previous
Previous

WEEK 11: From Fracturing to Adding Debris To Simulation

Next
Next

WEEK 13: It’s All Coming Together Now!